Cell penetrating peptides and cationic antibacterial peptides: two sides of the same coin
Cell penetrating peptides (CPP) and cationic antibacterial peptides (CAP) have similar physicochemical properties and yet it is not understood how such similar peptides display different activities. To address this question, we used Iztli peptide 1 (IP-1) because it has both CPP and CAP activities....
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 289; no. 21; pp. 14448 - 14457 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
23.05.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Cell penetrating peptides (CPP) and cationic antibacterial peptides (CAP) have similar physicochemical properties and yet it is not understood how such similar peptides display different activities. To address this question, we used Iztli peptide 1 (IP-1) because it has both CPP and CAP activities. Combining experimental and computational modeling of the internalization of IP-1, we show it is not internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis, yet it permeates into many different cell types, including fungi and human cells. We also show that IP-1 makes pores in the presence of high electrical potential at the membrane, such as those found in bacteria and mitochondria. These results provide the basis to understand the functional redundancy of CPPs and CAPs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1074/jbc.M113.515023 |