Cell penetrating peptides and cationic antibacterial peptides: two sides of the same coin

Cell penetrating peptides (CPP) and cationic antibacterial peptides (CAP) have similar physicochemical properties and yet it is not understood how such similar peptides display different activities. To address this question, we used Iztli peptide 1 (IP-1) because it has both CPP and CAP activities....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 289; no. 21; pp. 14448 - 14457
Main Authors Rodriguez Plaza, Jonathan G, Morales-Nava, Rosmarbel, Diener, Christian, Schreiber, Gabriele, Gonzalez, Zyanya D, Lara Ortiz, Maria Teresa, Ortega Blake, Ivan, Pantoja, Omar, Volkmer, Rudolf, Klipp, Edda, Herrmann, Andreas, Del Rio, Gabriel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 23.05.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cell penetrating peptides (CPP) and cationic antibacterial peptides (CAP) have similar physicochemical properties and yet it is not understood how such similar peptides display different activities. To address this question, we used Iztli peptide 1 (IP-1) because it has both CPP and CAP activities. Combining experimental and computational modeling of the internalization of IP-1, we show it is not internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis, yet it permeates into many different cell types, including fungi and human cells. We also show that IP-1 makes pores in the presence of high electrical potential at the membrane, such as those found in bacteria and mitochondria. These results provide the basis to understand the functional redundancy of CPPs and CAPs.
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M113.515023