Weaning, yearling, and preharvest ultrasound measures of fat and muscle area in steers, bulls, and heifers

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 80; no. 11; pp. 2817 - 2824
• Main Authors: CREWS, D. H, SHANNON, N. H, CREWS, R. E, KEMP, R. A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Savoy, IL American Society of Animal Science 01.11.2002; Oxford University Press
• Subjects: Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology; Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging; Age Factors; Animal productions; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Body Composition - physiology; Body fat; Cattle; Cattle - anatomy & histology; Cattle - growth & development; Female; Food industries; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Male; Meat - standards; Meat and meat product industries; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging; Muscular system; Phenotype; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sex Characteristics; Terrestrial animal productions; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonography; Vertebrates; Weaning; Farming animal; Ruminant animal; Ox; Experimental study; Carcass; Body composition; Vertebrata; Accuracy; Mammalia; Steers; Carcass Composition; Beef cattle; Fat; Bulls; Meat production; Heifer; Muscle; Artiodactyla; Animal production; Beef; Ultrasound; Ungulata; Age; Ultrasonic method
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.2527/2002.80112817x

Longissimus muscle area and fat thickness were measured following weaning, at yearling, and prior to harvest using real-time ultrasound, and corresponding carcass measurements were recorded 3 to 7 d following the preharvest scan in composite steers (n = 116, 447 +/- 19 d), bulls (n = 224, 521 +/- 11 d), and heifers (n = 257,532 +/- 12 d). Although fat deposition was limited in bulls and heifers from weaning to yearling, coefficients of variation ranged from 8.46 to 13.46% for muscle area, and from 27.55 to 38.95% for fat thickness, indicating that significant phenotypic variance exists across genders. Residual correlations, adjusted for the effects of year of birth, gender, and age at measurement, were high and ranged from 0.79 to 0.87 among ultrasound and carcass measures of muscle area. Residual correlations among ultrasound and carcass measures of fat thickness were also high, ranging from 0.64 to 0.86. Weaning and/or yearling ultrasound muscle area yielded similarly accurate predictions of carcass muscle area. Yearling ultrasound fat thickness accounted for 13% more of the observed variance in carcass fat thickness than the weaning ultrasound measure in single-trait prediction models. When both weaning and yearling ultrasound measures were used to predict carcass fat thickness, partial R2 values were 0.15 and 0.61 for weaning and yearling ultrasound fat thickness, respectively. The difference between predicted and carcass measures with respect to muscle area (fat thickness) was less than 6.45 cm2 (2.5 mm) for 80.2 to 88.9% (90.3 to 95%) of animals. Preharvest ultrasound measures yielded standard errors of prediction of less than 4.95 cm2 for muscle area and 1.51 mm or less for fat thickness. These results indicate that ultrasound measures taken between weaning and yearling provide accurate predictors of corresponding carcass traits in steers, bulls, and heifers.