Estimating Ground‐Level PM2.5 by Fusing Satellite and Station Observations: A Geo‐Intelligent Deep Learning Approach
Fusing satellite observations and station measurements to estimate ground‐level PM2.5 is promising for monitoring PM2.5 pollution. A geo‐intelligent approach, which incorporates geographical correlation into an intelligent deep learning architecture, is developed to estimate PM2.5. Specifically, it...
Saved in:
Published in | Geophysical research letters Vol. 44; no. 23; pp. 11,985 - 11,993 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
16.12.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Fusing satellite observations and station measurements to estimate ground‐level PM2.5 is promising for monitoring PM2.5 pollution. A geo‐intelligent approach, which incorporates geographical correlation into an intelligent deep learning architecture, is developed to estimate PM2.5. Specifically, it considers geographical distance and spatiotemporally correlated PM2.5 in a deep belief network (denoted as Geoi‐DBN). Geoi‐DBN can capture the essential features associated with PM2.5 from latent factors. It was trained and tested with data from China in 2015. The results show that Geoi‐DBN performs significantly better than the traditional neural network. The out‐of‐sample cross‐validation R2 increases from 0.42 to 0.88, and RMSE decreases from 29.96 to 13.03 μg/m3. On the basis of the derived PM2.5 distribution, it is predicted that over 80% of the Chinese population live in areas with an annual mean PM2.5 of greater than 35 μg/m3. This study provides a new perspective for air pollution monitoring in large geographic regions.
Key Points
A deep learning architecture is established to estimate ground‐level PM2.5 by fusing satellite and station observations
A geo‐intelligent model is developed to incorporate geographical correlation into deep learning for performance improvement
This model shows a superior estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.88, RMSE = 13.03 μg/m3) at national scale |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This article was corrected on 26 JUL 2018. See the end of the full text for details. |
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2017GL075710 |