Time-kill profiles of Enterococcus to antibiotics used for intravitreal therapy

To determine and then compare the time-kill profiles of Enterococcus to antibiotics used for intravitreal therapy. The time-kill profiles of four endophthalmitis isolates of Enterococcus faecalis, one vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis isolate, and three vancomycin-resistant isolates of E. faecium wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmic surgery and lasers Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 295 - 299
Main Authors KOWALSKI, R. P, KARENCHAK, L. M, WARREN, B. B, ELLER, A. W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thorofare, NJ Slack 01.04.1998
SLACK INCORPORATED
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine and then compare the time-kill profiles of Enterococcus to antibiotics used for intravitreal therapy. The time-kill profiles of four endophthalmitis isolates of Enterococcus faecalis, one vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis isolate, and three vancomycin-resistant isolates of E. faecium were determined against vancomycin, amikacin, cefazolin, gentamicin, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, clindamycin, and the combinations of vancomycin and amikacin, vancomycin and ceftazidime, vancomycin and gentamicin, vancomycin and ampicillin, cefazolin and gentamicin, and ampicillin and gentamicin. No single antibiotic or combination was bactericidal (defined as 99.9% kill) to all isolates of Enterococcus. Gentamicin was bactericidal to all E. faecalis isolates. None of the tested antibiotics were bactericidal to vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. The time-kill profiles demonstrated that vancomycin and ceftazidime did not produce a 99.9% kill for E. faecalis in this small study. Gentamicin combined with either cefazolin or ampicillin had somewhat better bactericidal activity and should be considered as an alternative therapy. Novel therapy may be necessary to treat endophthalmitis because of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, depending on the susceptibility patterns of the individual isolate and the response to initial therapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1082-3069
2325-8160
2325-8179