The effects of an educational meeting and subsequent computer reminders on the ordering of laboratory tests by rheumatologists: an interrupted time series analysis

• Published in: Clinical and experimental rheumatology Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 379 - 383
• Main Authors: Lesuis, Nienke, den Broeder, Nathan, Boers, Nadine, Piek, Ester, Teerenstra, Steven, Hulscher, Marlies, van Vollenhoven, Ronald, den Broeder, Alfons A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Italy 01.05.2017
• Subjects: Biomarkers - blood; Blood Chemical Analysis - trends; Blood Chemical Analysis - utilization; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - trends; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - utilization; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - trends; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization; Education, Medical, Continuing - methods; Humans; Inservice Training - methods; Interrupted Time Series Analysis; Medical Order Entry Systems - trends; Medical Order Entry Systems - utilization; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Netherlands; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends; Predictive Value of Tests; Reminder Systems - trends; Reminder Systems - utilization; Rheumatologists - education; Rheumatologists - trends; Time Factors; Unnecessary Procedures
• ISSN: 0392-856X

To examine the effects of an educational meeting and subsequent computer reminders on the number of ordered laboratory tests. Using interrupted time series analysis we assessed whether trends in the number of laboratory tests ordered by rheumatologists between September 2012 and September 2015 at the Sint Maartenskliniek (the Netherlands) changed following an educational meeting (September 2013) and the introduction of computer reminders into the Computerised Physician Order Entry System (July 2014). The analyses were done for the set of tests on which both interventions had focussed (intervention tests; complement, cryoglobulins, immunoglobins, myeloma protein) and a set of control tests unrelated to the interventions (alanine transferase, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide, C-reactive protein, creatine, haemoglobin, leukocytes, mean corpuscular volume, rheumatoid factor and thrombocytes). At the start of the study, 101 intervention tests and 7660 control tests were ordered per month by the rheumatologists. After the educational meeting, both the level and trend of ordered intervention and control tests did not change significantly. After implementation of the reminders, the level of ordered intervention tests decreased by 85.0 tests (95%-CI -133.3 to -36.8, p<0.01), the level of control tests did not change following the introduction of reminders. In summary, an educational meeting alone was not effective in decreasing the number of ordered intervention tests, but the combination with computer reminders did result in a large decrease of those tests. Therefore, we recommend using computer reminders in addition to education if reduction of inappropriate test use is aimed for.