Nociception-guided versus Standard Care during Remifentanil–Propofol Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW BACKGROUND:The multidimensional index of nociception, the nociception level, outperforms blood pressure and heart rate in detection of nociceptive events during anesthesia. We hypothesized that nociception level–guided anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnesthesiology (Philadelphia) Vol. 130; no. 5; pp. 745 - 755
Main Authors Meijer, Fleur S, Martini, Chris H, Broens, Suzanne, Boon, Martijn, Niesters, Marieke, Aarts, Leon, Olofsen, Erik, van Velzen, Monique, Dahan, Albert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Copyright by , the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc 01.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW BACKGROUND:The multidimensional index of nociception, the nociception level, outperforms blood pressure and heart rate in detection of nociceptive events during anesthesia. We hypothesized that nociception level–guided analgesia reduces opioid consumption and suboptimal anesthesia events such as low blood pressure and use of vasoactive medication. METHODS:In this single-blinded randomized study, 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists class I–III adult patients of either sex, scheduled for major abdominal procedures under remifentanil/propofol anesthesia by target-controlled infusion, were included. During the procedure nociception level, noninvasive blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored. Patients were randomized to receive standard clinical care or nociception level–guided analgesia. In the nociception level–guided group, remifentanil concentration was reduced when index values were less than 10 or increased when values were above 25 for at least 1 min, in steps of 0.5 to 1.0 ng/ml. Propofol was titrated to bispectral index values between 45 and 55. The primary outcomes of the study were remifentanil and propofol consumption and inadequate anesthesia events. RESULTS:Compared with standard care, remifentanil administration was reduced in nociception level–guided patients from (mean ± SD) 0.119 ± 0.033 to 0.086 ± 0.032 μg · kg · min (mean difference, 0.039 μg · kg · min; 95% CI, 0.025–0.052 μg · kg · min; P < 0.001). Among nociception level–guided patients, 2 of 40 (5%) experienced a hypotensive event (mean arterial pressure values less than 55 mm Hg) versus 11 of 40 (28%) patients in the control group (relative risk, 0.271; 95% CI, 0.08–0.77; P = 0.006). In the nociception level–guided group, 16 of 40 (40%) patients received vasoactive medication versus 25 of 40 (63%) patients in the standard care group (relative risk, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.40–0.99; P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS:Nociception level-guided analgesia during major abdominal surgery resulted in 30% less remifentanil consumption.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0003-3022
1528-1175
DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000002634