Comparison and a Possible Source of Disagreement between Experimental and Numerical Results in a Czochralski Model

Experimental and numerical observations of oscillatory instability of melt flow in a Czochralski model are compared, and a disagreement observed at small crystal dummy rotation rates is addressed. To exclude uncertainties connected with flow along the free surface, the latter is covered by a no-slip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFluid dynamics & materials processing Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 209 - 234
Main Authors Haslavsky, V, Miroshnichenko, E, Kit, E, Gelfgat, A Yu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Duluth Tech Science Press 01.01.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Experimental and numerical observations of oscillatory instability of melt flow in a Czochralski model are compared, and a disagreement observed at small crystal dummy rotation rates is addressed. To exclude uncertainties connected with flow along the free surface, the latter is covered by a no-slip thermally insulating ring. Experiments reveal an appearance of oscillations at temperature differences smaller than the numerically predicted critical ones. At the same time, a steep increase of the oscillations amplitude is observed just beyond the computed threshold values. By increasing the dummy rotation gradually, we are able to qualitatively confirm the numerically predicted flow destabilization. A good quantitative comparison is reached only with a rather strong rotation of the crystal dummy. Focusing on the disagreement in the non-rotating case, we argue that the experimentally observed instability is triggered by an external excitation that results from low-amplitude temperature oscillations in thermostatic baths. This argument is supported by a numerical simulation of the parametrically excited model.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1555-256X
1555-2578
DOI:10.3970/fdmp.2013.009.209