Anti-C1q antibodies in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

To study anti-C1q antibodies in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to evaluate their prognostic significance for the occurrence of disease flares or pregnancy complications. Twenty-one pregnancies in 19 SLE patients prospectively followed were analyzed. Disease activity wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental rheumatology Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 449 - 452
Main Authors MOSCA, M, STRIGINI, F, GHIRARDELLO, A, MIGLIORINI, P, BOMBARDIERI, S, DORIA, A, PRATESI, F, TANI, C, IACCARINO, L, CHIMENTI, D, CARMIGNANI, A, CECCHI, M, ZAMPIERI, S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Pisa Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 01.05.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To study anti-C1q antibodies in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to evaluate their prognostic significance for the occurrence of disease flares or pregnancy complications. Twenty-one pregnancies in 19 SLE patients prospectively followed were analyzed. Disease activity was evaluated on the basis of the physician's intention to treat and a modified version of the ECLAM index. Anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in the sera by an ELISA assay. Antinuclear antibodies, anti-ENA antibodies, anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant were also performed. In all the patients the disease was inactive at the beginning of the pregnancy. Four flares of disease activity were observed in 4 pregnancies (19%) and obstetric complications were encountered in 7 pregnancies (43%). Anti-C1q antibodies were positive in 4 (19%) pregnancies and anti-dsDNA antibodies in 8 (38%). The presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies at the first assessment was correlated with the occurrence of obstetric complications (p<0.05). The presence of anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA antibodies at the first assessment had no prognostic significance for the occurrence of flares or obstetric complications during the course of pregnancy. Although the small number of patients studied did not allow for statistically significant analysis, flares appeared to be more likely to occur in patients presenting with anti-dsDNA or anti-C1q antibodies during pregnancy compared to patients with no changes in these antibody titers (43% vs 8% respectively). The presence of anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA antibodies does not seem to be prognostic for the occurrence of flares during pregnancy. Further studies are warranted to explore this possibility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0392-856X
1593-098X