Palliative Care in Heart Failure: The PAL-HF Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 70; no. 3; pp. 331 - 341
• Main Authors: Rogers, Joseph G, Patel, Chetan B, Mentz, Robert J, Granger, Bradi B, Steinhauser, Karen E, Fiuzat, Mona, Adams, Patricia A, Speck, Adam, Johnson, Kimberly S, Krishnamoorthy, Arun, Yang, Hongqiu, Anstrom, Kevin J, Dodson, Gwen C, Taylor, Jr, Donald H, Kirchner, Jerry L, Mark, Daniel B, O'Connor, Christopher M, Tulsky, James A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Limited 18.07.2017
• Subjects: Aged; Anxiety; Cardiology; Cardiomyopathy; Chronic illnesses; Confidence intervals; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart; Heart diseases; Heart failure; Heart Failure - diagnosis; Heart Failure - therapy; Hospitals; Humans; Intervention; Intubation; Male; Mental depression; Morbidity; Mortality; Nurse practitioners; Pain; Palliation; Palliative care; Palliative Care - methods; Patients; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary arteries; Quality of Life; Randomization; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; quality of life; heart failure; palliative care
• ISSN: 0735-1097; 1558-3597
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.030

Advanced heart failure (HF) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Conventional therapy may not sufficiently reduce patient suffering and maximize quality of life. The authors investigated whether an interdisciplinary palliative care intervention in addition to evidence-based HF care improves certain outcomes. The authors randomized 150 patients with advanced HF between August 15, 2012, and June 25, 2015, to usual care (UC) (n = 75) or UC plus a palliative care intervention (UC + PAL) (n = 75) at a single center. Primary endpoints were 2 quality-of-life measurements, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care scale (FACIT-Pal), assessed at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included assessments of depression and anxiety (measured via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), spiritual well-being (measured via the FACIT-Spiritual Well-Being scale [FACIT-Sp]), hospitalizations, and mortality. Patients randomized to UC + PAL versus UC alone had clinically significant incremental improvement in KCCQ and FACIT-Pal scores from randomization to 6 months (KCCQ difference = 9.49 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 18.05, p = 0.030; FACIT-Pal difference = 11.77 points, 95% CI: 0.84 to 22.71, p = 0.035). Depression improved in UC + PAL patients (HADS-depression difference = -1.94 points; p = 0.020) versus UC-alone patients, with similar findings for anxiety (HADS-anxiety difference = -1.83 points; p = 0.048). Spiritual well-being was improved in UC + PAL versus UC-alone patients (FACIT-Sp difference = 3.98 points; p = 0.027). Randomization to UC + PAL did not affect rehospitalization or mortality. An interdisciplinary palliative care intervention in advanced HF patients showed consistently greater benefits in quality of life, anxiety, depression, and spiritual well-being compared with UC alone. (Palliative Care in Heart Failure [PAL-HF]; NCT01589601).