Radionuclide techniques for evaluating dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy
To assess the clinical significance of radionuclide techniques in evaluating dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (CAD-CM). 28 patients with DCM and 55 patients with CAD-CM were studied. All patients underwent 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion SPECT and 18F-FDG myocardial metabolic...
Saved in:
Published in | Chinese medical journal Vol. 113; no. 5; p. 392 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
China
01.05.2000
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To assess the clinical significance of radionuclide techniques in evaluating dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (CAD-CM).
28 patients with DCM and 55 patients with CAD-CM were studied. All patients underwent 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion SPECT and 18F-FDG myocardial metabolic PET. 78 patients had 99mTc-RBC radionuclide ventriculography and 68 patients had coronary angiography.
The results of 23 patients (82%) with DCM showed mild and non-segmental distribution perfusion abnormalities. 52 patients with CAD-CM (95%) showed perfusion abnormalities that distributed along the coronary vessel territories. Significant perfusion defects were found in 4 patients with DCM (14%) and 45 patients with CAD-CM (82%) (P < 0.01). The average perfusion score was 4.5 +/- 2.6 in DCM and 9.6 +/- 2.5 in CAD-CM and the area of diminished perfusion was significantly smaller in DCM than in CAD-CM (P < 0.001). Two patients with DCM and 18 patients with CAD-CM had metabolic defects. The patterns of perfusion/metabolic imaging showed mismatch in most patients with CAD-CM but match in most patients with DCM. The LVEF in patients with DCM and CAD-CM was both decreased but the decreases were not statistically different between DCM and CAD-CM. The RVEF in patients with DCM was significantly lower than that in patients with CAD-CM (32.4% +/- 13.9% vs 40.9% +/- 15.4%, P < 0.05).
The radionuclide techniques are helpful for distinguishing DCM from CAD-CM. The segmental perfusion abnormality and RVEF are the most important factors for differentiation of DCM from CAD-CM. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0366-6999 |