Satisfaction with upper-extremity surgery in individuals with tetraplegia
To measure the satisfaction of individuals with tetraplegia with their upper-extremity reconstructive surgery. Survey. Two Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems centers. Sixty-seven individuals with spinal cord injury at the C4 through C8 motor level (107 arms). Participants had upper-extremity surgery t...
Saved in:
Published in | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 84; no. 8; pp. 1145 - 1149 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier
01.08.2003
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To measure the satisfaction of individuals with tetraplegia with their upper-extremity reconstructive surgery.
Survey.
Two Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems centers.
Sixty-seven individuals with spinal cord injury at the C4 through C8 motor level (107 arms).
Participants had upper-extremity surgery to improve function. The surgical procedures included tendon transfers for elbow extension, wrist extension, hand grasp, and pinch or hand grasp neuroprosthesis.
A survey was mailed to participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as, "If I had it to do over, I would have the hand/arm surgery again," using a 5-level Likert scale (ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree).
Seventy percent of the participants were generally satisfied with the results of their upper-extremity surgery, 77% reported a positive impact on their lives, 68% reported improvements in activities of daily living (ADLs), 66% reported improved independence, 69% reported improvement in occupation, 71% reported improved appearance or neutral, 78% reported their hand worked as well (or neutral) as it did when surgery was first performed, and 86% reported postoperative therapy as being beneficial.
Upper-extremity surgery had a positive impact on life, increased ability to perform ADLs and to be independent, and improved quality of life. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00292-2 |