An institutional review of the management of choledocholithiasis in 1616 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

• Published in: The American surgeon Vol. 60; no. 4; p. 273
• Main Authors: Newman, 3rd, L, Newman, C, Baird, D R, Eubanks, S, Mason, E, Duncan, T, Lucas, G W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.04.1994
• Subjects: Cholangiography; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Gallstones - diagnostic imaging; Gallstones - surgery; Humans; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic
• ISSN: 0003-1348

At Georgia Baptist Medical Center, 1616 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between December 1989 and December 1992; and 103 perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures were performed, 79 preoperative and 24 postoperative. Endoscopic sphincterotomy with stone extraction was performed in 49 patients (4.7%). Normal ERCP was noted in 46 patients (44%), four patients failed stone extraction preoperatively, and two patients failed extraction postoperatively (5.7%). Four patients had small stones (< 2 mm) managed expectantly without sphincterotomy. Ten laparoscopic common bile duct explorations and eight open common bile duct explorations were performed without retained stones after these procedures. The incidence of detected choledocholithiasis requiring intervention was 4.4 per cent, which is significantly lower than the published incidence of 8 to 15 per cent. It is assumed that a higher percentage of stones may have been detected with liberal or routine use of cholangiography. The clinical significance of these potentially missed stones have not been manifest in our series to date. The authors believe that although improved patient selection may lower the percentage of normal ERCP, this combination of minimally invasive techniques provides a satisfactory approach to choledocholithiasis.