A multivariate analysis of en bloc extended radical mastectomy versus conventional radical mastectomy in operable breast cancer

We made clinical trials of en bloc extended radical mastectomy (EXT) of a new type in 118 patients from 1980 through 1985. A variety of conventional radical mastectomies (RDL) were also performed in 105 patients from 1973 through 1985. A multivariate analysis was performed of the results to compare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational surgery Vol. 77; no. 1; p. 48
Main Authors Noguchi, M, Taniya, T, Koyasaki, N, Miyazaki, I
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy 01.01.1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We made clinical trials of en bloc extended radical mastectomy (EXT) of a new type in 118 patients from 1980 through 1985. A variety of conventional radical mastectomies (RDL) were also performed in 105 patients from 1973 through 1985. A multivariate analysis was performed of the results to compare EXT and RDL. The result showed the 5-year survival rates of 91 +/- 2.6% and 83 +/- 3.7% were achieved for the EXT and RDL groups, respectively (Cox P value for comparison of survival curves = 0.16). Adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly favourable result of EXT (P = 0.05). This difference was most remarkable in patients with one to three metastatic axillary lymph nodes, although it was not statistically significant because of too small a number of patients available (P = 0.18). The results are thus not definite, but suggest that EXT may be advantageous over RDL especially in patients with a few metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
AbstractList We made clinical trials of en bloc extended radical mastectomy (EXT) of a new type in 118 patients from 1980 through 1985. A variety of conventional radical mastectomies (RDL) were also performed in 105 patients from 1973 through 1985. A multivariate analysis was performed of the results to compare EXT and RDL. The result showed the 5-year survival rates of 91 +/- 2.6% and 83 +/- 3.7% were achieved for the EXT and RDL groups, respectively (Cox P value for comparison of survival curves = 0.16). Adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly favourable result of EXT (P = 0.05). This difference was most remarkable in patients with one to three metastatic axillary lymph nodes, although it was not statistically significant because of too small a number of patients available (P = 0.18). The results are thus not definite, but suggest that EXT may be advantageous over RDL especially in patients with a few metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
Author Miyazaki, I
Koyasaki, N
Noguchi, M
Taniya, T
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M
  surname: Noguchi
  fullname: Noguchi, M
  organization: Department of Surgery (II), Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: T
  surname: Taniya
  fullname: Taniya, T
– sequence: 3
  givenname: N
  surname: Koyasaki
  fullname: Koyasaki, N
– sequence: 4
  givenname: I
  surname: Miyazaki
  fullname: Miyazaki, I
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1577580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkL1qwzAUhTWkpEnaRyjoBQyyFFvWGEL_oNClncO90hWo2JKRlNBMffUGmrHTGc53vuGs2SKmSAu2EkKKZhj64ZatS_kSQhnVmSVbtp3W3SBW7GfHp-NYwwlygEocIoznEgpPnlPkOCbL6btSdOR4BhcsjHyCUsnWNJ35iXI5Fm5TPFGsIV3m_2Eh8jRTBhyJY6ZLwS1ES_mO3XgYC91fc8M-nx4_9i_N2_vz63731sxSdbVRW9Qee5DSCN8a06JrDSqP6MiC1G2HSqOwCEOvEfW2dd5gq8XQe-OVkhv28OedjziRO8w5TJDPh-sR8hfnIF6c
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
ExternalDocumentID 1577580
Genre Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
.GJ
1CY
53G
5GY
5RE
AAQQT
ABCQX
ABOCM
AENEX
AFFNX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CGR
CUY
CVF
DIK
ECM
EIF
F5P
FRP
HYE
L7B
NPM
OK1
P2P
RPM
SJN
UDS
WH7
Y3D
ZGI
ZXP
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-34b7fb6a2290f1991bd19b3fbbdeca2715b37b0cba867bb741df9b17086f9f332
ISSN 0020-8868
IngestDate Thu May 23 22:56:56 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p235t-34b7fb6a2290f1991bd19b3fbbdeca2715b37b0cba867bb741df9b17086f9f332
PMID 1577580
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_1577580
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1992 Jan-Mar
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1992-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 1992
  text: 1992 Jan-Mar
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Italy
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Italy
PublicationTitle International surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Int Surg
PublicationYear 1992
SSID ssj0039359
Score 1.4255679
Snippet We made clinical trials of en bloc extended radical mastectomy (EXT) of a new type in 118 patients from 1980 through 1985. A variety of conventional radical...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 48
SubjectTerms Aged
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Mastectomy, Extended Radical
Mastectomy, Radical
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Title A multivariate analysis of en bloc extended radical mastectomy versus conventional radical mastectomy in operable breast cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1577580
Volume 77
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3PS8MwFMeDPxC8iKLib3LwNipN067ZcYjiD_Q0YbeR1yQyYd1wU9gu_uu-NOnaycQfl1KSUEo_bZr38n3vEXKuGYgQEhGIJEuCGP8RgeBKBJmJtIpigLQoyfLw2Lx5iu-6SbcSZBbRJRO4yGZL40r-QxXbkKuNkv0D2flFsQHPkS8ekTAef8W47fSA72jv4pKxIWsJRnRuNelZo3RyN16l25EZyLHdNxgOpg2ryHgbLwrPlwzr44pypF-LGCuwGvaJlYplXtb7UknhK8_iuBZsXehnn23NlQXna0fm_alckGnfD6dyLF0d7fkO0QOOmvnG28pH4fSscx9FGTMQBkK4AjrlvOvLt9TfLzeJutSbNX6jQQGQJSlaN-GPnV8SaPueVbKaCjsTPlp_jvtXF3HJTgTk7m-TbPjhX8yMYrnR2SZb3k6gbQd9h6zofJd8tGkdOC2B06GhOqcWOC2BU0-SViSpA07rwJcN6-e0BE4dcOqA75Gn66vO5U3gK2gEo4gnk4DHkBpoSpvU31iRGyjWAm4AlM5klLIEeAphBlI0U_wuY6ZMC1iKdq5pGc6jfbKWD3N9QKjiYWi4jpi2CS2VAcZFGCmZtTSTHNQh2XfPqzdyaVJ6_kEefddxTDard-WErBv8KvUpLvEmcFZQ-gSCQFyx
link.rule.ids 783
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+multivariate+analysis+of+en+bloc+extended+radical+mastectomy+versus+conventional+radical+mastectomy+in+operable+breast+cancer&rft.jtitle=International+surgery&rft.au=Noguchi%2C+M&rft.au=Taniya%2C+T&rft.au=Koyasaki%2C+N&rft.au=Miyazaki%2C+I&rft.date=1992-01-01&rft.issn=0020-8868&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F1577580&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F1577580&rft.externalDocID=1577580
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0020-8868&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0020-8868&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0020-8868&client=summon