Influencing Factors on Pupillary Light Responses as a Biomarker for Local Retinal Function in a Large Normative Cohort

• Published in: Investigative ophthalmology & visual science Vol. 65; no. 6; p. 3
• Main Authors: Jendritza, Ricarda, Stingl, Krunoslav, Strasser, Torsten, Jung, Ronja, Tonagel, Felix, Richter, Paul, Sonntag, Anton, Peters, Tobias, Wilhelm, Helmut, Wilhelm, Barbara, Kelbsch, Carina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 03.06.2024
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Light; Male; Middle Aged; Photic Stimulation; Pupil - physiology; Reference Values; Reflex, Pupillary - physiology; Retina; Retina - diagnostic imaging; Retina - physiology; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1552-5783; 0146-0404; 1552-5783
• DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.6.3

Investigating influencing factors on the pupillary light response (PLR) as a biomarker for local retinal function by providing epidemiological data of a large normative collective and to establish a normative database for the evaluation of chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). Demographic and ophthalmologic characteristics were captured and PLR parameters of 150 healthy participants (94 women) aged 18 to 79 years (median = 46 years) were measured with L-cone- and rod-favoring CPC protocols. Linear-mixed effects models were performed to determine factors influencing the PLR and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data were correlated with the pupillary function volume. Relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA) and latency under L-cone- and rod-favoring stimulation were statistically significantly affected by the stimulus eccentricity (P < 0.0001, respectively). Iris color and gender did not affect relMCA or latency significantly; visual hemifield, season, and daytime showed only minor influence under few stimulus conditions. Age had a statistically significant effect on latency under rod-specific stimulation with a latency prolongation ≥60 years. Under photopic and scotopic conditions, baseline pupil diameter declined significantly with increasing age (P < 0.0001, respectively). Pupillary function volume and OCT data were not correlated relevantly. Stimulus eccentricity had the most relevant impact on relMCA and latency of the PLR during L-cone- and rod-favoring stimulation. Latency is prolonged ≥60 years under scotopic conditions. Considering the large study collective, a representative normative database for relMCA and latency as valid readout parameters for L-cone- and rod-favoring stimulation could be established. This further validates the usability of the PLR in CPC as a biomarker for local retinal function.