Pneumatic dilation in the treatment of achalasia

• Published in: Gastroenterología y hepatología Vol. 36; no. 8; p. 508
• Main Authors: Ruiz Cuesta, Patricia, Hervás Molina, Antonio José, Jurado García, Juan, Pleguezuelo Navarro, María, García Sánchez, Valle, Casáis Juanena, Luis L, Gálvez Calderón, Carmen, Naranjo Rodríguez, Antonio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Spanish
• Published: Spain 01.10.2013
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dilatation - instrumentation; Dilatation - methods; Esophageal Achalasia - therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult; Achalasia; Dilatación neumática; Pneumatic dilatation; Acalasia; Miotomía quirúrgica; Surgical myotomy
• ISSN: 0210-5705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2013.05.009

Pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy are currently the procedures of choice to treat achalasia. The selection of one or other treatment depends on the experience of each center and patient preferences. To review the experience of pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia in our center. We included all patients with a clinical, endoscopic and manometric diagnosis compatible with achalasia who underwent pneumatic dilation in a 19-year period. All dilations were routinely performed with a Rigiflex(®) balloon, usually at pressures of 250, 250 and 300mm Hg in three inflations of one minute, each separated by one minute. The success of the dilation was assessed on the basis of the patient's symptoms, the number of sessions, the need for surgery, and the presence of complications. A total of 171 patients were included, 53.2% men and 46.8% women, with a mean age of 51.53±17.78 years (16-87 years), from June 1993 to October 2012. A 35-mm balloon was used in 157 patients, a 30-mm balloon in 9 patients and a 40-mm balloon in 7 patients. A single dilation session was required in 108 patients, two sessions were required in 56 patients, with a mean time between the first and second sessions of 25.23±43.25 months (1-215 months), and 3 sessions were required in 7 patients with a mean time between the second and third sessions of 6.86±5.33 months (1-15 months). Outcome after dilation was successful in 81% of the patients. Of the 140 responders, 121 had complete response (complete disappearance of symptoms without recurrence) and 19 partial response (initial disappearance of symptoms with subsequent reappearance). Surgery (Heller myotomy) was required in 15.8% of the patients. Perforation occurred in 4 of the 171 patients as a complication of the technique; these perforations were satisfactorily resolved, two by conservative treatment and two by surgery. There was no mortality associated with the technique or its complications. In our series, pneumatic dilation had a high success rate. In most patients, a single session was required and the complications rate was low. These results show that this technique is safe and effective in these patients, avoiding a large number of surgical interventions.