Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review

• Published in: Atención primaria Vol. 52; no. 10; pp. 738 - 749
• Main Authors: Pascual López, José Antonio, Gil Pérez, Trinidad, Sánchez Sánchez, Juan Antonio, Menárguez Puche, Juan Francisco
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Spanish
• Published: Spain 01.12.2020
• Subjects: Patient outcome assessment; Atención primaria de salud; Questionnaire; Patient-centered care; Evaluación del resultado de la atención al paciente; Systematic review; Primary Health Care; Revisión sistemática; Cuestionario; Atención dirigida al paciente
• ISSN: 1578-1275
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.004

Despite the acknowledged importance of 'Person Centered Care' (PCC), there are obvious limitations for its determination and measurement due to the difficulty of its exact definition. The objective of our review is to identify valid tools that measure the PCC or some of its aspects in the field of Primary Health Care. Systematic review DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, PSYCinfo, IME-Biomedicine, LILACS and TESEO until May 31, 2018. The inclusion criteria were: validation studies of questionnaires, systematic reviews of validation or other descriptive studies, all of which were carried out in the context of the Primary Health Care and that measured aspects of the PCC in professionals and/or patients. Two investigators independently reviewed the articles and their discrepancies were resolved by a third investigator. Data were collected on the measured ACP aspects, target population, type of questionnaire, and data on validity and reliability. 1,415 articles were located, to which 54 additional references were subsequently added via cross references. Finally, there were 75 articles that fulfilled all the criteria and there were 39 which had the tools identified and classified according to the dimensions analyzed. Due to the difficulty of measuring PCC as a whole, most of the articles refer only to one of its aspects or dimensions, with the patient's perspective prevailing over that of the professional. All these tools are, nevertheless, an important starting point for future questionnaires that attempt an integral approach to the PCC.