Computationally Comparing and Analyzing All Published Scoring Systems for Diagnosis of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

The clinical literature presents four different scoring systems (SS) for the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) by four institutions: ISTH, JMHLW, JAAM and KSTH. In this study a Java program was written to retrieve medical records from the MIMIC-II database and apply the crite...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStudies in health technology and informatics Vol. 216; p. 956
Main Authors Kury, Fabrício S P, Cimino, James J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands 2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The clinical literature presents four different scoring systems (SS) for the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) by four institutions: ISTH, JMHLW, JAAM and KSTH. In this study a Java program was written to retrieve medical records from the MIMIC-II database and apply the criteria of all four. The program then quantified the agreement of each DIC SS with each other and demonstrated notorious dissent. Furthermore, the average internal composition of each score was also quantified. All source code produced is available for download at https://github.com/fabkury/hedicim.
ISSN:0926-9630
DOI:10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-956