State Out-Of-Pocket Caps On Insulin Costs: No Significant Increase In Claims Or Utilization

Nearly all patients with type 1 diabetes and 20-30 percent of patients with type 2 diabetes use insulin to manage glycemic control. Approximately one-quarter of patients who use insulin report underuse because of cost. In response, more than twenty states have implemented monthly caps on insulin out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth affairs (Millwood, Va.) Vol. 43; no. 8; pp. 1137 - 21
Main Authors Anderson, Kelly E, Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn, Gutierrez, Eric J, Schmutz, H Weston, Rose, Michael R, Brixner, Diana, McQueen, R Brett
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States The People to People Health Foundation, Inc., Project HOPE 01.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0278-2715
2694-233X
2694-233X
1544-5208
DOI10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00118

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Nearly all patients with type 1 diabetes and 20-30 percent of patients with type 2 diabetes use insulin to manage glycemic control. Approximately one-quarter of patients who use insulin report underuse because of cost. In response, more than twenty states have implemented monthly caps on insulin out-of-pocket spending, ranging from $25 to $100. Using a difference-in-differences approach, this study evaluated whether state-level caps on insulin out-of-pocket spending change insulin usage among commercially insured enrollees. The study included 33,134 people ages 18-64 who had type 1 diabetes or who used insulin to manage type 2 diabetes with commercial insurance coverage that was subject to state-level oversight and was included in the 25 percent sample of the IQVIA PharMetrics database during 2018-21. Insulin out-of-pocket caps did not significantly increase quarterly insulin claims for enrollees who had type 1 diabetes or who used insulin to manage type 2 diabetes. State-level caps on insulin out-of-pocket spending for commercial enrollees did not significantly increase insulin use; that may be in part because of out-of-pocket expenses being lower than cap amounts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-2715
2694-233X
2694-233X
1544-5208
DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00118