Considering Augmentative and Alternative Communication Research for Brain-Computer Interface Practice
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aim to provide access to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices via brain activity alone. However, while BCI technology is expanding in the laboratory setting there is minimal incorporation into clinical practice. Building upon established AAC resea...
Saved in:
Published in | Assistive technology outcomes and benefits Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 1 - 20 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Assistive Technology Industry Association
2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aim to provide access to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices via brain activity alone. However, while BCI technology is expanding in the laboratory setting there is minimal incorporation into clinical practice. Building upon established AAC research and clinical best practices may aid the clinical translation of BCI practice, allowing advancements in both fields to be fully leveraged.
A multidisciplinary team developed considerations for how BCI products, practice, and policy may build upon existing AAC research, based upon published reports of existing AAC and BCI procedures.
Within each consideration, a review of BCI research is provided, along with considerations regarding how BCI procedures may build upon existing AAC methods. The consistent use of clinical/research procedures across disciplines can help facilitate collaborative efforts, engaging a range-individuals within the AAC community in the transition of BCI into clinical practice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1938-727X 1938-7261 1938-7261 |