Influence of implantation site on growth, antigen expression and metastatic potential of human colonic cancer HT29 and 5583 xenografts in nude mice

• Published in: Invasion and metastasis Vol. 8; no. 4; p. 238
• Main Authors: Sekikawa, K, Arends, J W, Verstijnen, C P, van der Linden, E, Dinjens, W, Schutte, B, Bosman, F T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland 1988
• Subjects: Animals; Carcinoembryonic Antigen - analysis; Collagen - analysis; Colonic Neoplasms - immunology; Colonic Neoplasms - pathology; Male; Mice; Mice, Nude; Mucins - analysis; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Transplantation; Secretory Component - analysis; Transplantation, Heterologous
• ISSN: 0251-1789

In order to study the interaction between tumors and host environmental factors, we xenografted cells from the human colonic carcinoma cell lines HT29 and 5583-S in the subcutis, cecum, spleen and liver of nude mice and compared growth characteristics, metastatic potential and some phenotypic features of the xenografts in these sites. No remarkable differences were observed between the tumors at different inoculation sites in regard of their expression of carcinoembryonic antigen and secretory component or type of mucin produced. Also the proportion of DNA synthesizing cells as determined by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation appeared to be comparable in the studied implantation sites. Local invasive growth characteristics and metastatic potential, however, showed marked differences. Subcutaneous and cecal xenografts frequently showed tumor cell invasion into the surrounding tissue, vasoinvasive growth and discontinuous basement membrane deposition, whereas splenic and hepatic implants demonstrated more encapsulation, no invasion of blood vessels and more continuous basement membrane deposition. Subcutaneous xenografts produced no metastasis. With HT29 cells liver and lymph node metastases occurred frequently from the splenic as well as the cecal xenografts. 5583 cells regularly produced liver metastases from the splenic xenografts, whereas no metastasis from cecal xenografts were observed. We conclude that although the patterns of invasive growth and the metastatic potential differ for various implantation sites, antigen expression and cell kinetic features of tumor implants are hardly influenced by the site of inoculation.