Respiratory response to tobacco dust exposure

Results of a study of the respiratory responses of 318 nonsmoking female workers to long-term tobacco dust exposure are reported. The mean total tobacco dust concentrations ranged from 0.9 to 27.5 mg per m3; the respirable fraction, from 0.3 to 3.6 mg per m3. The mean length of exposure to tobacco d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American review of respiratory disease Vol. 113; no. 6; p. 751
Main Authors Valić, F, Beritić, D, Butković, D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.1976
Subjects
Adolescent
Adult
Dust
Environmental Exposure
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Middle Aged
Nicotiana
Occupational Diseases - physiopathology
Plants, Toxic
Respiratory Tract Diseases - physiopathology
Vital Capacity
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Results of a study of the respiratory responses of 318 nonsmoking female workers to long-term tobacco dust exposure are reported. The mean total tobacco dust concentrations ranged from 0.9 to 27.5 mg per m3; the respirable fraction, from 0.3 to 3.6 mg per m3. The mean length of exposure to tobacco dust was 14.9 years; 24 per cent of the workers had been exposed to tobacco dust for 20 years or more. Comparatively low prevalences of chronic respiratory symptoms were found, and only the prevalences of chest tightness and wheezing were significantly higher among workers exposed to tobacco dust than those of the control group (P less than 0.01). Calculating the expected 1-sec forced expiratory volume and forced vital capacity values by means of multiple linear regression equations, developed on the basis of data obtained in the 210 control subjects, revealed no significant differences between the measured and expected ventilatory capacity values among any of the groups of the workers observed. In contrast to negative findings with regard to chronic respiratory effects, significant acute decreases in ventilatory capacity during the work shift were recorded. No dose-response relationship was found between the level of exposure and the acute decreases in ventilatory capacity.
ISSN:0003-0805