Optimality Criteria
A first optimality criterion, that of the fully stressed design, was already introduced in the previous chapter. The buckling of a circular tube in compression is used to illustrate a second criterion, that of simultaneous buckling modes. In fact, when the tube forms part of a truss structure, this...
Saved in:
Published in | Optimization Methods in Structural Design Vol. 242; pp. 29 - 53 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Book Chapter |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Springer International Publishing AG
2017
Springer International Publishing |
Series | Solid Mechanics and Its Applications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A first optimality criterion, that of the fully stressed design, was already introduced in the previous chapter. The buckling of a circular tube in compression is used to illustrate a second criterion, that of simultaneous buckling modes. In fact, when the tube forms part of a truss structure, this might be seen as a logical extension of the principle of the fully stressed design. This second optimality criterion leads directly to an efficiency formula, expressing the maximum stress that can be achieved in a thin tube or other component in terms of a suitable structural index and the elastic modulus of the material. The concept of the design space, widely used in subsequent chapters, is introduced with the circular tube. A third criterion is developed for the maximum stiffness of a structure, on the basis of a simple truss but taken in principle to apply more widely. It is shown that under certain conditions, a fully stressed design, with maximum strength-to-weight ratio, also has maximum stiffness. A spreadsheet program is presented for the optimization of circular and square tubes in compression, subject to dimensional restrictions and specified maximum allowable stress. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 3319551965 9783319551968 |
ISSN: | 0925-0042 2214-7764 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-319-55197-5_2 |