Prognostic value of fragmented QRS in acute pulmonary embolism: a cross-sectional-analytic study of the Iranian population

• Published in: American journal of cardiovascular disease Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 21 - 28
• Main Authors: Asadi Anar, Mahsa, Ansari, Akram, Erabi, Gisou, Rahmanian, Mohammad, Movahedi, Mahdiyeh, Chichagi, Fatemeh, Deravi, Niloofar, Taghavi, Farid, Kazemi, Babak, Javanshir, Elnaz, Amouei, Erfan, Ghaffari, Samad
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States e-Century Publishing Corporation 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Original; prognostic value; acute pulmonary embolism (APE); Fragmented QRS (fQRS)
• ISSN: 2160-200X; 2160-200X

Acute Pulmonary embolism (APE) is considered one of the deadliest cardiovascular diseases. Electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities in pulmonary embolism (PE) are increasingly reported. A growing number of studies have recommended that ECG plays a crucial role in the prognostic assessment of PE patients. However, there is scarce data on the prognostic importance of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on outcomes in patients with APE. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of fQRS in APE patients. This is a cross-sectional-analytic study. This study included 280 patients diagnosed with APE admitted to Shahid Madani hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was used to diagnose APE. A checklist was prepared for all patients, demographic, clinical characteristics, and Major Adverse Cardiopulmonary events (MACPE), including in-hospital mortality, need for thrombolysis, mechanical ventilation, and surgical embolectomy, were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who manifested fQRS on their ECG and patients who did not; Then, demographic, clinical characteristics, and MACPE were compared in the two groups, as mentioned earlier. Furthermore, all statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software. 48 patients (17.14%) had fQRS(+) on their ECG, and 232 patients (82.86%) did not have it on their ECG. In data analysis, 22 patients (8.7%) had in-hospital mortality, 35 patients (13.9%) needed thrombolysis, nine patients (3.9%) required mechanical ventilation, and 13 patients (5.1%) needed surgical embolectomy. fQRS was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (P = 0.225), need for thrombolysis (P = 0.684), mechanical ventilation (P = 1.000), and surgical embolectomy (P = 1.000). Demographic and clinical characteristics were also similar in both groups. This study does not support the idea that fQRS on ECG is a valuable predictor of in-hospital mortality, the need for thrombolysis, mechanical ventilation, and surgical embolectomy.