The Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Antibiotics for the Treatment of Bronchiectasis in Adults: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Inhaled antibiotics are recommended conditionally by international bronchiectasis guidelines for the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis, but results of individual studies are inconsistent. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of inhaled ant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChest Vol. 166; no. 1; pp. 61 - 80
Main Authors Cordeiro, Ricardo, Choi, Hayoung, Haworth, Charles S, Chalmers, James D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American College of Chest Physicians 01.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Inhaled antibiotics are recommended conditionally by international bronchiectasis guidelines for the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis, but results of individual studies are inconsistent. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics in bronchiectasis. Subsequent publications have supplemented the existing body of evidence further in this area. To what extent do inhaled antibiotics demonstrate both efficacy and safety as a treatment option for adults with bronchiectasis? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of inhaled antibiotics in adult patients with bronchiectasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for eligible studies. Studies were included if they enrolled adults with bronchiectasis diagnosed by CT imaging and had a treatment duration of at least 4 weeks. The primary end point was exacerbation frequency, with additional key efficacy end points including severe exacerbations, bacterial load, symptoms, quality of life, and FEV . Data were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis. Twenty studies involving 3,468 patients were included. Inhaled antibiotics were associated with reduced number of patients with exacerbations (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96), a slight reduction in exacerbation frequency (rate ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91), a probable reduction in the frequency of severe exacerbations (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.74), and a likely slight increase in time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94). Inhaled antibiotics likely lead to a slight increase in the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis respiratory symptom score (mean difference, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.44-4.31) and may reduce scores on the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (mean difference, -3.13; 95% CI, -5.93 to -0.32). Bacterial load consistently was reduced, but FEV was not changed with treatment. Evidence suggests little to no difference in adverse effects between groups (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.30). Antibiotic-resistant organisms likely were increased by treatment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, inhaled antibiotics resulted in a slight reduction in exacerbations, a probable reduction in severe exacerbations, and a likely slight improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adults with bronchiectasis. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42023384694; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1931-3543
0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.045