Collecting Practice-level Data in a Changing Physician Office-based Ambulatory Care Environment: A Pilot Study Examining the Physician induction interview Component of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

• Published in: Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research no. 176; p. 1
• Main Authors: Halley, Meghan C, Rendle, Katharine A, Gugerty, Brian, Lau, Denys T, Luft, Harold S, Gillespie, Katherine A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.11.2017
• Subjects: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data; Anthropology, Cultural - methods; Continental Population Groups; Data Collection - methods; Female; Health Care Surveys - methods; Humans; Interviews as Topic - methods; Male; Middle Aged; National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.); Physicians' Offices - statistics & numerical data; Pilot Projects; Professional Practice Location - statistics & numerical data; Research Design; Sex Factors; United States; United States
• ISSN: 0083-2057

Objective This report examines ways to improve National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data on practice and physician characteristics in multispecialty group practices. Methods From February to April 2013, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) conducted a pilot study to observe the collection of the NAMCS physician interview information component in a large multispecialty group practice. Nine physicians were randomly sampled using standard NAMCS recruitment procedures; eight were eligible and agreed to participate. Using standard protocols, three field representatives conducted NAMCS physician induction interviews (PIIs) while trained ethnographers observed and audio recorded the interviews. Transcripts and field notes were analyzed to identify recurrent issues in the data collection process. Results The majority of the NAMCS items appeared to have been easily answered by the physician respondents. Among the items that appeared to be difficult to answer, three themes emerged: (a) physician respondents demonstrated an inconsistent understanding of "location" in responding to questions; (b) lack of familiarity with administrative matters made certain questions difficult for physicians to answer; and (c) certain primary care‑oriented questions were not relevant to specialty care providers. Conclusions Some PII survey questions were challenging for physicians in a multispecialty practice setting. Improving the design and administration of NAMCS data collection is part of NCHS' continuous quality improvement process.