Reflux esophagitis after esophagectomy: impact of duodenogastroesophageal reflux

• Published in: Diseases of the esophagus Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 381 - 385
• Main Authors: Nishimura, K., Tanaka, T., Tsubuku, T., Matono, S., Nagano, T., Murata, K., Aoyama, Y., Yanagawa, T., Shirouzu, K., Fujita, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.07.2012
• Subjects: acid reflux; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; bile reflux; Bile Reflux - etiology; Duodenogastric Reflux - etiology; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery; Esophagectomy - adverse effects; Esophagitis, Peptic - etiology; esophagogastrostomy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastric Acidity Determination; Gastroesophageal Reflux - etiology; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Helicobactor pylori infection; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; reflux esophagitis; Risk Factors
• ISSN: 1120-8694; 1442-2050
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01268.x

SUMMARY Reflux esophagitis (RE) is a known complication disturbing patients' quality of life after esophageal resection. It is generally recognized that bile reflux as well as acid reflux cause RE. However, the clinical influence of acid and bile reflux, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection on RE in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy is not yet clarified. Sixty patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy following esophagectomy were enrolled in this study. They underwent examination for H. pylori infection, endoscopic examination, and continuous 24‐hour pH and bilirubin monitoring, at 1 month after surgery. The influence of acid and/or bile reflux, H. pylori infection, and others on the development of RE were investigated. RE was observed in 19 patients (32%) at 1 month after esophagogastrostomy, mild RE in 16 (27%), and severe RE in 3 (5%). The percentage of time duration of both acid and bile reflux into the cervical esophagus was higher in patients with RE than in those without (P= 0.027, P < 0.001). A significant difference in %time pH < 4 acid reflux was found between mild RE and severe RE (P= 0.014), and a statistical difference in %time abs. > 0.14 between non‐RE and mild RE (P= 0.017). Acid and/or bile reflux was observed in 31 patients (52%), acid‐only reflux in 6 (10%), bile‐only reflux in 15 (25%), and acid‐and‐bile reflux in 10 (17%). Severe RE was observed only in patients having acid‐and‐bile reflux. On the univariate analysis, no infection of H. pylori, acid reflux, and bile reflux were determined to be the influencing factors to RE among the clinical factors including age, gender, route of esophageal reconstruction, H. pylori infection, and acid‐and‐bile reflux. In the subanalysis using the logistic model, there were significant correlations between bile reflux and RE irrespective of the presence of H. pylori infection (P= 0.016, P= 0.007). On the other hand, there was a significant correlation between acid reflux and RE only in patients without H. pylori infection (P= 0.039). In the early period after esophagogastrostomy, bile reflux could cause RE irrespective of H. pylori infection, while acid reflex could cause RE only in patients without H. pylori infection. There is a possibility that bile reflux plays an important role in the development of RE after esophagectomy.