Experimental study of electrolysis‐induced hepatic necrosis

Background One of the most promising but unexplored methods for treating patients with irresectable liver tumours is electrolysis. This study examined the effect of increasing ‘current dose’ on the volume of the lesion induced in normal rat liver. Methods A direct current generator, connected to pla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of surgery Vol. 85; no. 9; pp. 1212 - 1216
Main Authors Robertson, G. S. M., Wemyss‐Holden, S. A., Dennison, A. R., Hall, P. De La M., Baxter, P., Maddern, G. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.09.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background One of the most promising but unexplored methods for treating patients with irresectable liver tumours is electrolysis. This study examined the effect of increasing ‘current dose’ on the volume of the lesion induced in normal rat liver. Methods A direct current generator, connected to platinum electrodes implanted in the rat liver, was used to examine the effect of (1) varying current doses from 1 to 5 coulombs and (2) electrode separation (2 or 20 mm), on the volume of liver necrosis. Results There was a significant correlation (P < 0·001) between the current dose and the volume of necrosis produced for each electrode separation. Placing the electrodes 2 mm apart resulted in smaller total volumes of necrosis than placing them 20 mm apart when anode lesions were significantly larger than cathode lesions (P < 0·05). Liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase) were significantly raised 1 day after treatment (P < 0·001) and predicted the total volume of hepatic necrosis (P < 0·001). Conclusion Predictable and reproducible areas of liver necrosis are produced with electrolysis. If these results extrapolate to larger animal models, this technique has potential for patients with irresectable primary and secondary liver tumours. © 1998 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00806.x