Universities and decision-making: programme and qualification mix - four learning pathways
The introduction of the Higher Education Qualifications Framework (HEQF) and the updated Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF) has caused many South African university departments to rethink their programme qualification mixes (PQMS). In addition to the requirements stated in the HEQ...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Vol. 114; no. 5; pp. 411 - 418 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.05.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The introduction of the Higher Education Qualifications Framework (HEQF) and the updated Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF) has caused many South African university departments to rethink their programme qualification mixes (PQMS). In addition to the requirements stated in the HEQSF, a number of other factors have to be taken into consideration by a university department. Of all the many factors involved in PQM decision-making, the focus of this paper is on the HEQSF requirements, ECSA standards, and ECSA registration and how these, together with the various qualifications and educational LPs provided for by the HEQSF may impact on the PQM decision taken by engineering departments and schools at South African universities. The proposed 'NQF L5-L10 pathway' tool is an attempt to move one step closer to the aim of achieving a structured decision-making approach for designing a PQM at departmental level. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2225-6253 |