CONSTITUTIONAL DISUSE OR DESUETUDE: THE CASE OF ARTICLE V

Article V of the United States Constitution is in decline and disuse. Studies of comparative formal amendment difficulty, the decelerating pace of Article V amendments, and the relative infrequency of Article V amendments in the modern era - the most recent having been ratified roughly one generatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBoston University law review Vol. 94; no. 3; p. 1029
Main Author Albert, Richard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Boston University School of Law 01.05.2014
Subjects
Constitutional law
Constitutions
Politics
Supreme Court decisions
Tax audits
United States > US
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Article V of the United States Constitution is in decline and disuse. Studies of comparative formal amendment difficulty, the decelerating pace of Article V amendments, and the relative infrequency of Article V amendments in the modern era - the most recent having been ratified roughly one generation ago, and the next-most recent a generation earlier - confirm the impression that Article V's federalist supermajority requirements make the United States Constitution one of the world's most difficult to amend formally. The consequence of formal amendment difficulty has been to reroute political actors pursuing constitutional change from formal to informal amendment. The attendant decline and disuse of Article V as a vehicle for constitutional amendment suggests that Article V may itself have changed informally. In this Article, I explore whether Article V has been informally amended by constitutional desuetude.
ISSN:0006-8047