MODERN FREE-TRADE AGREEMENTS AND THE RISE OF POPULISM: HOW TO ADDRESS POPULAR DISCONTENT?

The difference between the post-war development of international legal trade regimes and the context of the latest free-trade initiatives is that the disparate effects of trade liberalisation have also become visible in the most advanced economies in the world, including the United States and the Eu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTeorija in praksa Vol. 56; pp. 438 - 514
Main Author Nahtigal, Matjaž
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ljubljana University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences 01.01.2019
Subjects
Developing countries
Discontent
Free trade
International trade
LDCs
Policy making
Populism
Rodrik, Dani
Trade agreements
Trade liberalization
New York
United States > US
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The difference between the post-war development of international legal trade regimes and the context of the latest free-trade initiatives is that the disparate effects of trade liberalisation have also become visible in the most advanced economies in the world, including the United States and the European Union, not only in developing countries. This trend requires a rethinking of trade arrangements that would provide suitable instruments, tools and policies when needed for restructuring. The key challenge in the process of deepening and widening the economic and legal integration is how to disseminate the economic, technological, financial and other benefits to those regions and parts of the population that are currently excluded. In order to overcome this negative trend, comprehensive efforts to disseminate the benefits as widely as possible should be applied at the local, national and international levels.
ISSN:0040-3598