The Cost of Price: Why and How to Get Beyond Intellectual Property Internalism
The field of intellectual property (IP) law today is focused, as the name itself advertises, on one particular institutional approach to scientific and cultural production: IP. When legal scholars explain this focus, they typically do so with reference to the virtues of price. Because price gives th...
Saved in:
Published in | UCLA law review Vol. 59; no. 4; p. 970 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Los Angeles
University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law
01.04.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The field of intellectual property (IP) law today is focused, as the name itself advertises, on one particular institutional approach to scientific and cultural production: IP. When legal scholars explain this focus, they typically do so with reference to the virtues of price. Because price gives them a decentralized way to link social welfare to the production of information, IP is alleged to be more efficient than other approaches. But the internalism that characterizes the field of IP cannot be justified by the value of efficiency. Using price to guide scientific and cultural production -- which is to say, using IP -- may have costs not only for efficiency, but also for distributive justice and informational privacy. The IP approach is in tension with the value of information privacy because relying on price to generate information facilitates the desire, the demand, and perhaps the capacity for price discrimination. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-5650 1943-1724 |