TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly deployed in the treatment of neuropsychiatric illness, under the presumption that stimulation of specific cortical targets can alter ongoing neural activity and cause circuit-level changes in brain function. While the electrophysiological effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inbioRxiv
Main Authors Solomon, Ethan A, Wang, Jeffrey B, Oya, Hiroyuki, Howard, Matthew A, Trapp, Nicholas T, Uitermarkt, Brandt D, Boes, Aaron D, Keller, Corey J
Format Journal Article Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 19.11.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly deployed in the treatment of neuropsychiatric illness, under the presumption that stimulation of specific cortical targets can alter ongoing neural activity and cause circuit-level changes in brain function. While the electrophysiological effects of TMS have been extensively studied with scalp electroencephalography (EEG), this approach is most useful for evaluating low-frequency neural activity at the cortical surface. As such, little is known about how TMS perturbs rhythmic activity among deeper structures - such as the hippocampus and amygdala - and whether stimulation can alter higher-frequency oscillations. Recent work has established that TMS can be safely used in patients with intracranial electrodes (iEEG), allowing for direct neural recordings at sufficient spatiotemporal resolution to examine localized oscillatory responses across the frequency spectrum. To that end, we recruited 17 neurosurgical patients with indwelling electrodes and recorded neural activity while patients underwent repeated trials of single-pulse TMS at several cortical sites. Stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) drove widespread low-frequency increases (3-8Hz) in frontolimbic cortices, as well as high-frequency decreases (30-110Hz) in frontotemporal areas, including the hippocampus. Stimulation to parietal cortex specifically provoked low-frequency responses in the medial temporal lobe. While most low-frequency activity was consistent with brief evoked responses, anterior frontal regions exhibited induced theta oscillations following DLPFC stimulation. Taken together, we established that non-invasive stimulation can (1) provoke a mixture of low-frequency evoked power and induced theta oscillations and (2) suppress high-frequency activity in deeper brain structures not directly accessed by stimulation itself.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1
content type line 23
ISSN:2692-8205
2692-8205
DOI:10.1101/2023.08.09.552524