How Does Voxel Size of Cone-beam Computed Tomography Effect Accurate Detection of Root Strip Perforations

• Published in: Iranian endodontic journal Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 43 - 48
• Main Authors: Afkhami, Farzaneh, Ghoncheh, Zahra, Khadiv, Fatemeh, Kaviani, Hanieh, Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Iran Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2021
• Subjects: Original; Diagnosis; Voxel Size; Strip Perforation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
• ISSN: 2008-2746; 1735-7497; 2008-2746
• DOI: 10.22037/iej.v16i1.25145

Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of different voxel sizes for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) when detecting strip perforations of variable sizes. We used 0.2 and 0.3 mm voxel for detecting root strip perforations. This was an study conducted on 155 extracted humans' mandibular first molars. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups ( =31). Perforation were not induced in the control group. In the remaining four groups, strip perforations of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm diameters were created in the mesiolingual canal using #3 Gates Glidden drills. The CBCT scans were taken first with a 12×9 cm field of view (FOV), 90 kVp, 4 mA, and 0.2 mm voxel size for 24 sec and then with a 12×9 cm FOV, 90 kVp, 2 mA, and 0.3 mm voxel size for another 24 sec. Two observers evaluated the images and reported the largest diameter of perforations. The results were compared with the gold standard values (determined by an electronic digital caliper) using statistical methods, including the kappa coefficient and generalized estimating equation ( <0.05). Based on the findings of our study, the inter-observer agreement ranged from 58-100%, while the intra-observer agreement was reported to be around 100%. The difference in accuracy between 0.2 and 0.3 mm voxel sizes was not statistically significant ( >0.05). In addition, the accuracy of detecting different perforation sizes in the CBCT did not follow a specific pattern. This study showed that CBCT is a reliable diagnostic tool, and even in lower dosages of 0.3 mm voxel size, image resolution and diagnostic accuracy was not affected. Moreover, smaller root perforations could be detected as accurately as larger ones with CBCT.