Brachial vein transposition: an alternative to hemodialysis arteriovenous graft

There is currently a worldwide effort to increase the options for autogenous hemodialysis access. To evaluate patency and complications of brachial vein transposition compared to other autogenous hemodialysis accesses. A retrospective evaluation of 43 patients and 45 procedures. Patients who did not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJornal vascular brasileiro Vol. 18; p. e20190077
Main Authors de Castro-Santos, Guilherme, Salles, Alberto Gualter, Dos Anjos, Giuliano Silva, Procópio, Ricardo Jayme, Navarro, Túlio Pinho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) 18.11.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is currently a worldwide effort to increase the options for autogenous hemodialysis access. To evaluate patency and complications of brachial vein transposition compared to other autogenous hemodialysis accesses. A retrospective evaluation of 43 patients and 45 procedures. Patients who did not have adequate superficial veins according to duplex scanning were allocated to brachial vein transposition. The sample was thus divided in two groups, as follows: A: brachial vein transposition n=10 and B: other autogenous accesses n=35. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of age diabetes, systemic arterial hypertension, dyslipidemias, arteriopathies, neoplasms, kidney disease stage, donor artery diameter, recipient vein diameter, systolic blood pressure in the operated limb, postoperative ischemia, hematoma, or infection. There were no statistical differences in terms of patency on day 7: A 80% vs. B 90% p=0.6, on day 30: A 80% vs. B 86% p=0.6, or on day 60: A 60% vs. B 80% p=0.22. There were statistical differences between the groups for number of previous fistulae A 1.0 ± 0.44 vs. B 0.6 ± 0.3 p = 0.04 and upper limb edema A: 20% x B 0% p = 0.04. A vein with diameter of less than 3 mm was associated with an increased risk of early occlusion (RR = 8 p = 0.0125). During the study period there were no procedures using grafts. Transposition of brachial vein is an alternative to arteriovenous graft.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this article.
Author informationGCS - Vascular surgeon; MSc and PhD candidate in Surgery, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Assistant Professor, Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). AGS and GSA - Vascular surgeons, Serviço de Cirurgia Vascular, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). RJP - Vascular surgeon; Coordinator, Serviço de Cirurgia Endovascular, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). TPN - Vascular surgeon; PhD in Surgery, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Associate Professor, Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Coordinator, Serviço de Cirurgia Vascular, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG).
Author contributionsConception and design: GCS, GSA, AGS, RJP, TPN Analysis and interpretation: GCS, RJP, TPN Data collection: GSA, AGS Writing the article: GCS Critical revision of the article: RJP, TPN Final approval of the article*: GCS, GSA, AGS, RJP, TPN Statistical analysis: GCS Overall responsibility: GCS, RJP, TPN *All authors have read and approved of the final version of the article submitted to J Vasc Bras.
ISSN:1677-5449
1677-7301
DOI:10.1590/1677-5449.190077