Secondary data bases and their use in outcomes research: a review of the area resource file and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project

• Published in: Journal of medical systems Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 175 - 181
• Main Author: Best, A E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Springer Nature B.V 01.06.1999
• Subjects: Area Resource File; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.); Cost-Benefit Analysis; Data banks; Databases as Topic - classification; Databases as Topic - economics; Databases as Topic - organization & administration; Evaluation; Health Care Costs - trends; Health Maintenance Organizations; Health Resources - classification; Health Resources - economics; Health Resources - organization & administration; Health Services - utilization; Health Services Research; Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; Hospitals; Humans; Medicare; Medicine; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Outcomes; Quality of Health Care; Studies; United States; United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; United States
• ISSN: 0148-5598; 1573-689X
• DOI: 10.1023/A:1020515419714

Secondary data sources are being used more frequently than ever in outcomes research. The speed and relative low cost of these data bases makes them ideal for analyzing outcomes. Today's researcher has numerous secondary data bases available for use. Few publications exist to help researchers locate the ideal data set for their needs. Herein, two national secondary data bases are reviewed: the Area Resource File (ARF) and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). These two data sets represent the two types of secondary data: aggregate and individual. ARF represents an aggregate data set and HCUP represents an individual data set. The advantages of each type of secondary data will also be reviewed.