Needs analysis on learning devices to support blended based high school physics teaching of North Sumatra

This research aims to describe: (1) high school physics teacher perception on blended learning, (2) physics teacher skill in using technologies in teaching, and (3) the availability of teaching devices that support blended learning. This research uses a survey method. The subject of this research co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIP conference proceedings Vol. 2659; no. 1
Main Authors Motlan, Sinuraya, Jurubahasa, Mihardi, Satria
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Melville American Institute of Physics 29.11.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI10.1063/5.0120385

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This research aims to describe: (1) high school physics teacher perception on blended learning, (2) physics teacher skill in using technologies in teaching, and (3) the availability of teaching devices that support blended learning. This research uses a survey method. The subject of this research consists of 72 high school physics teachers of 33 districts/municipalities which are at North Sumatera. The instruments used are questionnaires, interview forms, and documentation study. The data analysis technique uses descriptive by percentage. This research shows that: (1) high school physics teacher perception in using blended learning is positive consecutively: 9.0 % strongly agree, 50.0% agree, 30.0% quite agree, and 11.0% don’t agree; (2) high school physics teacher in using teaching technology tends to be good with the details are as follows: 74.0% capable of using online and blended learning, 79.0% can access teaching video, and 73.0% can conduct video editing; and (3) the availability of learning devices covers lesson plan, teaching materials, student worksheet, media, the strategy of developing teaching devices, and evaluation instruments, is 85.0%. However, the relevancy aspect in supporting blended learning of overall learning device is 60.5 %.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1
content type line 21
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0120385