Precision dispersive approaches versus unitarized chiral perturbation theory for the lightest scalar resonances σ/f0(500) and κ/K0∗(700)

For several decades, the σ / f 0 ( 500 ) and κ / K 0 ∗ ( 700 ) resonances have been subject to long-standing debate. Both their existence and properties were controversial until very recently. In this tutorial review, we compare model-independent dispersive and analytic techniques versus unitarized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European physical journal. ST, Special topics Vol. 230; no. 6; pp. 1539 - 1574
Main Authors Peláez, José R., Rodas, Arkaitz, Ruiz de Elvira, Jacobo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.07.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For several decades, the σ / f 0 ( 500 ) and κ / K 0 ∗ ( 700 ) resonances have been subject to long-standing debate. Both their existence and properties were controversial until very recently. In this tutorial review, we compare model-independent dispersive and analytic techniques versus unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory, when applied to the lightest scalar mesons σ / f 0 ( 500 ) and κ / K 0 ∗ ( 700 ) . Generically, the former have settled the long-standing controversy about the existence of these states, providing a precise determination of their parameters, whereas unitarization of chiral effective theories allows us to understand their nature, spectroscopic classification and dependence on QCD parameters. Here we review in a pedagogical way their uses, advantages and caveats.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1951-6355
1951-6401
DOI:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00142-9