Decentralisations in practice in Southern Africa

Different forms of decentralisation are occurring in parallel, often in ways that cause confusion, ambiguity, high transaction costs and conflict, in southern Africa. Case studies in Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe show how political authorities with downward accountability to electorates co-e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIDS bulletin (Brighton. 1984) Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 79 - 96
Main Authors Ashley, Caroline, Chaumba, Joseph, Cousins, Ben, Lahiff, Edward, Matsimbe, Zefanias, Mehta, Lyla, Mokgope, Kgopotso, Mombeshora, Solomon, Mtisi, Sobona, Nhantumbo, Isilda, Nicol, Alan, Norfolk, Simon, Ntshona, Zolile, Pereira, Joao, Scoones, Ian, Seshia, Shaila, The Sustainable Livelihoods in Southern Africa Team, Wolmer, William
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.07.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Different forms of decentralisation are occurring in parallel, often in ways that cause confusion, ambiguity, high transaction costs and conflict, in southern Africa. Case studies in Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe show how political authorities with downward accountability to electorates co-exist and sometimes conflict with decentralised service delivery (through line ministries, NGOs or donor projects). Multiple decentralisations have also brought conflicts between new local government authorities and "traditional" authorities - often further complicated by party-related affiliations. Rather than relying on idealised notions of decentralisation, the case studies suggest that effortsshould be made to avoid the creation of parallel authority structures. Local government reform must take account of existing social and economic complexity and local power dynamics and not wish them away in the development of new systems of local governance. And, without providing adequate resources, and attempting to build capacity beyond councils, new elected authorities may quickly lose legitimacy, and fail to provide the development benefits they claim. (Original abstract)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0265-5012
DOI:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2003.tb00079.x