Proofs-as-Model-Transformations

This paper provides an overview of how to develop model transformations that are “provably correct” with respect to a given functional specification. The approach is based in a mathematical formalism called Constructive Type Theory (CTT) and a related synthesis formal method known as proofs-as-progr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTheory and Practice of Model Transformations Vol. 5063; pp. 214 - 228
Main Author Poernomo, Iman
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Springer Berlin / Heidelberg 2008
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN3540699260
9783540699262
ISSN0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI10.1007/978-3-540-69927-9_15

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper provides an overview of how to develop model transformations that are “provably correct” with respect to a given functional specification. The approach is based in a mathematical formalism called Constructive Type Theory (CTT) and a related synthesis formal method known as proofs-as-programs. We outline how CTT can be used to provide a uniform formal foundation for representing models, metamodels and model transformations as understood within the Object Management Group’s Meta-Object Facility (MOF 2.0) and Model Driven Architecture (MDA) suite of standards [6, 8]. CTT was originally developed to provide a unifying foundation for logic, data and programs. It is higher-order, in the sense that it permits representation and reasoning about programs, types of programs and types of types. We argue that this higher-order aspect affords a natural formal definition of metamodel/model/model instantiation relationships within the MOF. We develop formal notions of models, metamodels and model transformation specifications by utilizing the logic that is built into CTT. In proofs-as-programs, a functional program specification is represented as a special kind of type. A program is provably correct with respect to a given specification if it can be typed by that specification. We develop an analogous approach, defining model transformation specifications as types and provably correct transformations as inhabitants of specification types.
ISBN:3540699260
9783540699262
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-69927-9_15