Analysis of Behavior Classification in Motivational Interviewing

Analysis of client and therapist behavior in counseling sessions can provide helpful insights for assessing the quality of the session and consequently, the client's behavioral outcome. In this paper, we study the automatic classification of standardized behavior codes (i.e. annotations) used f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting Vol. 2021; p. 110
Main Authors Tavabi, Leili, Tran, Trang, Stefanov, Kalin, Borsari, Brian, Woolley, Joshua D, Scherer, Stefan, Soleymani, Mohammad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.2021
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Analysis of client and therapist behavior in counseling sessions can provide helpful insights for assessing the quality of the session and consequently, the client's behavioral outcome. In this paper, we study the automatic classification of standardized behavior codes (i.e. annotations) used for assessment of psychotherapy sessions in Motivational Interviewing (MI). We develop models and examine the classification of client behaviors throughout MI sessions, comparing the performance by models trained on large pretrained embeddings (RoBERTa) versus interpretable and expert-selected features (LIWC). Our best performing model using the pretrained RoBERTa embeddings beats the baseline model, achieving an F1 score of 0.66 in the subject-independent 3-class classification. Through statistical analysis on the classification results, we identify prominent LIWC features that may not have been captured by the model using pretrained embeddings. Although classification using LIWC features underperforms RoBERTa, our findings motivate the future direction of incorporating auxiliary tasks in the classification of MI codes.
DOI:10.18653/v1/2021.clpsych-1.13