Immunization review meetings: "Low Hanging Fruit" for capacity building and data quality improvement?

• Published in: The Pan African medical journal Vol. 27; no. Suppl 3; p. 21
• Main Authors: Shimp, Lora, Mohammed, Nassor, Oot, Lisa, Mokaya, Evans, Kiyemba, Timothy, Ssekitto, Gerald, Alminana, Adriana
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Uganda African Field Epidemiology Network 2017
• Subjects: Adult; Africa; Bills; Capacity Building; Cost control; Data Accuracy; Documentation; Humans; Immunization; Immunization Programs - organization & administration; Immunization Programs - standards; Longitudinal Studies; Peer review; Peers; Quality; Quality Improvement; Retrospective Studies; Systematic review; Teaching methods; Trends; Vaccines; Uganda; Mozambique; Kenya; United States > US; Ethiopia; Tanzania; Review meeting; lessons learned; routine immunization program strengthening; peer learning; best practices; adult learning; data quality and use; performance improvement; peer exchange
• ISSN: 1937-8688
• DOI: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2017.27.3.11516

Although systematic program review meetings are common practice in many health and immunization programs, there is little documentation on their implementation and role. Adult education principles espouse opportunities for peer exchange to build capacity and cross-learning, for which review meetings have been a forum utilized in immunization programs for many years. This study describes the process and use of review meetings to build immunization technical capacity in four African countries since 2011. A longitudinal case study providing retrospective descriptive analysis and qualitative data collected on immunization program implementation and review meetings conducted within the years of 2011-2016 with district and facility health staff and technical partners from Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Based on summarized findings and analyses from over 200 review meetings conducted in the four countries within the time period of 2011-2016, these meetings have been shown to be effective tools for improving immunization program performance and the capacity of health staff. Review meetings (ideally conducted quarterly) provide health workers with beneficial and low cost opportunities for adult learning, including building skills in data analysis and review, which can be sustained at district and health facility levels. In combination with other performance improvement approaches implemented and supported in countries (such as supportive supervision, training, and on-the-job learning and assessment), review meetings can also contribute to achievement of immunization and health outcomes.