Predicting RGP daily wear success

• Published in: The CLAO journal Vol. 25; no. 3; p. 152
• Main Authors: Polse, K A, Graham, A D, Fusaro, R E, Gan, C M, Rivera, R K, Chan, J S, McNamara, N A, Sanders, T S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.1999
• Subjects: Adaptation, Physiological; Adolescent; Adult; Contact Lenses, Extended-Wear; Female; Humans; Male; Patient Compliance; Patient Satisfaction; Prosthesis Fitting
• ISSN: 0733-8902

While most clinicians agree that fitting of rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses is the preferred treatment strategy for some types of patients, many patients have difficulty adapting to full-time daily wear of these lenses. The Contact Lens Extended Wear Study (CLEWS) is a randomized, controlled clinical trial in which subjects are first adapted to full-time RGP daily wear prior to randomization to either high or medium oxygen transmissibility (Dk/L) RGP lenses for 12 months of extended wear. The CLEWS pre-randomization data provide an opportunity to examine the reasons some patients fail to adapt to RGP daily wear and to determine whether a patient's demographic, historical, and ocular characteristics can be used to predict RGP daily wear success. From 1,809 individuals who expressed interest in RGP lenses, 411 subjects passed the CLEWS screening criteria and were fit with high Dk lenses (mean Dk = 92 x 10(-11) [cm2/sec][mL 02/mL x mmHg]). The fitting strategy included minimum apical alignment, lid attachment, centration, and average lens diameters of 9.2 mm. Success was defined as a minimum of 14 hours per day without adverse ocular responses that would contraindicate either full-day daily wear or extended wear. Of the 411 subjects, 286 (69.6%) were successful with RGP extended wear. Among the 125 failures, 50 were based on clinician findings (e.g., cornea, vision, compliance), while 75 subjects chose to discontinue wear because of unacceptable comfort or poor vision. Multivariate linear logistic regression modeling shows that younger patients with greater corneal curvature (K) and less predicted residual astigmatism have a higher probability of RGP daily wear success. Our study showed that RGP lenses can be fit with a relatively high rate of success and that many of those patients who elect to discontinue RGP daily wear report unacceptable comfort as the primary reason. We propose a Bayesian statistical method that will assist clinicians in selecting those candidates for RGP daily wear who are most likely to adapt successfully.