Personal Safety and Human Rights: Contributions to a Debate from the Argentinean Context
Based on an observation of varied demands for safety & justice as a reaction to criminal violence & the permanent controversy between safety & human rights, this article proposes to: (1) analyze the concept of safety within the human rights discourse & (2) discuss the demand for safe...
Saved in:
Published in | Espacio abierto Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 487 - 512 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Spanish |
Published |
01.07.2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Based on an observation of varied demands for safety & justice as a reaction to criminal violence & the permanent controversy between safety & human rights, this article proposes to: (1) analyze the concept of safety within the human rights discourse & (2) discuss the demand for safety within the human rights concept developed by Herrera Flores (1989), which considers the dialectic interaction between human activity, needs & values. Agnes Heller states that radical needs are "all those that are born in the capitalist society as a consequence of the development of civil society (interference of democratic logic with capitalist logic), but that cannot be satisfied within the same [ . ] because they are factors of the superseding of capitalist society." Safety appears to fit the definition of a radical need to the degree that the capitalist society not only fails to satisfy this need, but also conspires against a person's safety. Safety therefore becomes a controversial human right when it goes against liberties & in favor of oppression. This article attempts to elucidate some aspects of this complex problem. References. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1315-0006 |