The role of heavy metals and toxic materials in the physiological ecology of submersed macrophytes

An overview of, and information from, a number of publications dealing with the availability, uptake rates and accumulation of metals (e.g. Fe, Cu, Cr, Cd, Pb) and organic substances (e.g. polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) and pesticides) by submersed and floating macrophytes are provided. Differences...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquatic botany Vol. 41; no. 1-3; pp. 87 - 109
Main Author GUILIZZONI, P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier 01.08.1991
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An overview of, and information from, a number of publications dealing with the availability, uptake rates and accumulation of metals (e.g. Fe, Cu, Cr, Cd, Pb) and organic substances (e.g. polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) and pesticides) by submersed and floating macrophytes are provided. Differences in metal enrichment are reported to be dependent mainly on the plant species, the seasonal growth rate changes, the tissue age, and metal or compound type. A brief review of the possible sites of absorption and accumulation of substances by the macrophytes is given and the role played by the roots and shoots is discussed. A higher concentration of metals in the plants usually, but not always, indicates a proportional increase in element levels in the water and/or sediments. Consequently, the implications for the use of macrophytes as phytogeochemical indicators for metals and other toxic materials in water bodies are also evaluated. Competition between elements and factors, indirectly influencing metal uptake such as, for example, light conditions and eutrophication, seem to limit in some cases the utility of using macrophytes as bio-indicators.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0304-3770
1879-1522
DOI:10.1016/0304-3770(91)90040-C