Consistent effect of eating rate on food and energy intake across twenty-four ad libitum meals

Foods consumed at lower eating rates (ER) lead to reductions in energy intake. Previous research has shown that texture-based differences in eating rateER can reduce meal size. The effect size and consistency of these effects across a wide range of composite and complex meals differing considerably...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of nutrition p. 1
Main Authors Heuven, Lise A J, van Bruinessen, Marieke, Tang, Claudia S, Stieger, Markus, Lasschuijt, Marlou P, Forde, Ciarán G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 16.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Foods consumed at lower eating rates (ER) lead to reductions in energy intake. Previous research has shown that texture-based differences in eating rateER can reduce meal size. The effect size and consistency of these effects across a wide range of composite and complex meals differing considerably in texture and varying in meal occasion have not been reported. We determined how consistently texture-based differences in ER can influence food and energy intake across a wide variety of meals. In a crossover design, healthy participants consumed twelve breakfast and twelve lunch meals that differed in texture to produce a fast or slow ER. A breakfast group ( = 15) and lunch group ( = 15) completed twelve meal sessions each (six 'fast' and six 'slow' meals), where intake was measured and behavioural video annotation was used to characterise eating behaviour. Liking did not differ significantly between fast and slow breakfasts ( = 0·44) or lunches ( = 0·76). The slow meals were consumed on average 39 % ± 9 % (breakfast) and 45 % ± 7 % (lunch) slower than the fast meals (both < 0·001). Participants consumed on average 22 % ± 5 % less food (84 g) and 13 % ± 6 % less energy (71 kcal) from slow compared with fast meals (mean ± SE; < 0·001). Consuming meals with a slower ER led to a reduction in food intake, where an average decrease of 20 % in ER produced an 11 % ± 1 % decrease in food intake (mean ± SE). These findings add to the growing body of evidence showing that ER can be manipulated using food texture and that this has aits consistent effect on food and energy intake across a wide variety of Hedonically equivalent meals.
ISSN:1475-2662
DOI:10.1017/S0007114524001478