Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of minocycline plus rifampicin in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by MRSA

The population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of minocycline, rifampicin and linezolid in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) caused by MRSA are described. Samples were collected in a Phase 4 study of oral minocycline plus rifampicin versus linezolid showing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Main Authors Pardos, Sonia Luque, Hope, William, Kotsaki, Antigone, Das, Shampa, Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Evangelos J, Kontopoulouk, Theano, Akinosoglou, Karolina, O'Hare, Miriam, Attwood, Marie L G, Bowker, Karen E, Noel, Alan R, Lovering, Andrew M, Bayliss, Mark A J, Evans, Rebecca N, MacGowan, Alasdair P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 16.10.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of minocycline, rifampicin and linezolid in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) caused by MRSA are described. Samples were collected in a Phase 4 study of oral minocycline plus rifampicin versus linezolid showing minocycline plus rifampicin to be non-inferior to linezolid. Antibiotics were assayed by HPLC or LC-MS, and a population PK model was developed using Pmetrics. The association between PK/PD indices and patient outcomes was explored. A three-compartment model (with an absorption compartment) with first-order input and elimination best described the data for the three drugs. No covariates were included in the final model. The population median values (95% credibility limits) of the clearance and volume of distribution were 7.412 L/h (5.121-8.361) and 14.155 L (6.799-33.901) for minocycline, 5.683 L/h (3.703-7.726) and 7.736 L (6.031-8.948) for rifampicin, and 1.970 L/h (1.326-2.499) and 20.169 L (12.857-32.629) for linezolid, respectively. Maximum a posteriori probability-Bayesian estimation plots of observed versus predicted had a slope of 0.999 r20.967 for minocycline, slope 0.998 r20.769 for rifampicin and slope 0.998 r20.895 for linezolid. PK/PD indices were not related to clinical outcome. Taking a translational minocycline fAUC24h/MIC target of >0.5 for minocycline in the presence of rifampicin, 96% (49/51) of patients reached the target. Population PK models of minocycline, rifampicin and linezolid were developed in patients with MRSA cSSTI and almost all patients reached the predefined PD index targets. As a result, neither AUC, MIC nor the AUC/MIC ratio could be related to clinical outcome.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1460-2091
1460-2091
DOI:10.1093/jac/dkae363