Update of the 2013 consensus conference "Management of the preoperative risk of infection"
The surgical site infections (SSI) are rare adverse events that may have severe consequences in terms of morbidity, mortality and costs. Guidelines on the preparation of the patient can reduce the risk of SSI. Previous guidelines were published in 2004. A steering committee and a group of experts we...
Saved in:
Published in | Progrès en urologie (Paris) Vol. 24; no. 9; p. 545 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | French |
Published |
France
01.07.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The surgical site infections (SSI) are rare adverse events that may have severe consequences in terms of morbidity, mortality and costs. Guidelines on the preparation of the patient can reduce the risk of SSI. Previous guidelines were published in 2004.
A steering committee and a group of experts were established after seeking professional societies that had participated in the previous guidelines. The working group has defined the objectives of revising and retained two main themes: skin preparation and nasal decolonization of patients with Staphylococcus aureus. We chose to report only the work done on the patient skin preparation. The working group relied on the method of recommendation for clinical practice of the High Authority for Health (HAS). The GRADE approach was used to analyze the articles published since 2004.
It is recommended to perform a preoperative shower but when does not matter. The use of a simple soap seems sufficient. Shampoo does not seem essential nor removal of varnish in the field of urology. Impregnated fabrics, adhesives fields and bacteriological insulating films are of little use to reduce the risk of infection. The depilation is not routinely required. It is recommended to perform a cleansing on contaminated skin. The use of an alcohol antiseptic is preferred, the successive application of two different antiseptics range is possible.
The updated guidelines on the patient skin preparation before urological surgery was necessary. It changed some guidelines that should appear in our daily practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1166-7087 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.purol.2014.04.005 |