Quality of the health information system: A comparative analysis of reported indicators, OECD Mexico 2010-2016.

To analyze quantity and quality of the information reported by Mexico to OECD in relation to health indicators. Analysis of frequency of indicators reporting, data quality, and comparison of reported values in the OECD environment. We analyzed 191 indicators. Mexico reported annually (2010-2016) 52....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSalud pública de México Vol. 61; no. 2; pp. 184 - 192
Main Authors Saturno-Hernández, Pedro Jesús, Martínez-Nicolás, Ismael, Flores-Hernández, Sergio, Poblano-Verástegui, Ofelia
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Mexico 01.03.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To analyze quantity and quality of the information reported by Mexico to OECD in relation to health indicators. Analysis of frequency of indicators reporting, data quality, and comparison of reported values in the OECD environment. We analyzed 191 indicators. Mexico reported annually (2010-2016) 52.9% of them. Never reported 45.5%. The highest frequency of not reported (84%) is in the "Quality of care" group. Among the reported, information is of poor quality in 28.7% of them. Comparatively, Mexico holds the worst results in OECD indicators on screening of cancer, child and in-hospital mortality from myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for diabetes, among others. Mexico has problems of lack and quality of reported information, and frequently unfavorable values among OECD countries. The information system needs improvement, in both quantity and quality of data, and its effective utilization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1606-7916
DOI:10.21149/9688