Timing of invasive treatment in NSTEMI: as fast as in STEMI?

The optimal timing of invasive diagnosis and therapy in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is still a matter of debate. The European Society of Cardiology recommends invasive diagnosis evaluation and revascularization for practically all patients with NSTEMI within 72 h. H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHerz Vol. 39; no. 6; pp. 677 - 684
Main Authors Jobs, A, Eitel, I, Desch, S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
German
Published Germany 01.09.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The optimal timing of invasive diagnosis and therapy in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is still a matter of debate. The European Society of Cardiology recommends invasive diagnosis evaluation and revascularization for practically all patients with NSTEMI within 72 h. High risk and very high risk patients should be evaluated invasively with coronary angiography within 24 h or 2 h, respectively. The risk of the individual patient should be stratified by means of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score. The recommendations and guidelines are based on the results of several randomized, controlled trials and are in accordance with other retrospective studies. However, observational studies indicate that in real life many high risk patients are not evaluated invasively by coronary angiography as timely as recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0340-9937
1615-6692
DOI:10.1007/s00059-014-4126-x