More, better feedback please: are learning analytics dashboards (LAD) the solution to a wicked problem?

• Published in: Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice
• Main Authors: Kitto, Simon, Chiang, H L Michelle, Ng, Olivia, Cleland, Jennifer
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands 26.08.2024
• Subjects: Learning analytics; Feedback; Digital dashboards; Educational technology; Health professions education
• ISSN: 1573-1677; 1573-1677
• DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10358-8

There is a long-standing lack of learner satisfaction with quality and quantity of feedback in health professions education (HPE) and training. To address this, university and training programmes are increasingly using technological advancements and data analytic tools to provide feedback. One such educational technology is the Learning Analytic Dashboard (LAD), which holds the promise of a comprehensive view of student performance via partial or fully automated feedback delivered to learners in real time. The possibility of displaying performance data visually, on a single platform, so users can access and process feedback efficiently and constantly, and use this to improve their performance, is very attractive to users, educators and institutions. However, the mainstream literature tends to take an atheoretical and instrumentalist view of LADs, a view that uncritically celebrates the promise of LAD's capacity to provide a 'technical fix' to the 'wicked problem' of feedback in health professions education. This paper seeks to recast the discussion of LADs as something other than a benign material technology using the lenses of Miller and Rose's technologies of government and Barry's theory of Technological Societies, where such technical devices are also inherently agentic and political. An examination of the purpose, design and deployment of LADs from these theoretical perspectives can reveal how these educational devices shape and govern the HPE learner body in different ways, which in turn, may produce a myriad of unintended- and ironic- effects on the feedback process. In this Reflections article we wish to encourage health professions education scholars to examine the practices and consequences thereof of the ever-expanding use of LADs more deeply and with a sense of urgency.